View forum thread

Overall rating of Staff position
Yesterday, I found a member of staff with more highly-rated important attributes for his role than a current member of my staff in that job. (Admittedly, his total rating was actually lower but I do understand why that was.) Anyway, I offered a contract to join my staff team intending to replace a current one.

He agreed terms and joined. But, with the extra member of staff in that role, (before sacking anyone), my overall rating for that staff position dropped by 1 at the last update.

Weird

How strange - I assume the overall summary for that position is pulling through all the maximum characteristics as it should do?

I can't offer any explanation, and sorry for the hijack but you've sort of addressed a point I've been thinking about recently. Do people care about an additional point or two in individual characteristics? Would you hire an extra coach just because he was one or two points higher in (say) outfield coaching than what you already had?