Quote:
Originally posted by Lemmy
The staff rating is worked out from the average of only the highest rated in each of the 5 areas.
What chyperhondriac is alluding to is that some of the attributes of the old staff might be better than the new ones.
Not sure that I've ever disagreed with anything Lemmy has said before, I've always thought the same way. But here's a first:
The first sentence is something I've gone along with for quite some time as it worked for me too. However, for my current staff now, it doesn't. My highest staff ratings for each position are currently 69/70/71/72/73 which is easily calculated as an average of 71... But my average staff rating is not 71.
The other option that has been suggested in the past, the average of the "
verall" value works for my staff still.
Does that work out for other managers?
I totally agree with the second sentence.